Skip navigation.
Home
We're the Chicken Mafia. Chickens of the world, unite!

Intelligent god, stupid people

joyfulchicken's picture

The Kansas Board of Education approved a new science standard that casts doubt on the theory of evolution and introduces "Intelligent Design" into science classes (Source: CNN.com).

For the past few years, fundamentalist Christians everywhere have been crapping their pants with joy over the supposedly scientific theory of Intelligent Design, or ID for short. Basically, the theory claims that life is too complex to have been the product of natural processes such as evolution, and that there must have been an intelligent designer who made it all happen.

Now, people are free to believe in whatever they like. And the existence of an intelligent designer is certainly possible. In fact, I too believe in an intelligent designer, and his name is the Flying Spaghetti Monster. But to say that some random unproven belief system like ID should be taught in school as science is just... stupid.

ID is not scientific at all. Everyone who paid attention in his high school science class knows that, to be considered scientific, a theory must be, among other things, falsifiable. This is where ID falls flat on its face. ID is not falsifiable. Since the Intelligent Designer is invisible and unobservable, there is no way to introduce scientific evidence that can dispute his existence.

On second thought, maybe there is evidence that can disprove ID. I'll state it in two words: Michael Jackson.

That's right, you heard me. I said Michael Jackson.

If Michael Jackson is a product of Intelligent Design, then the intelligent designer may not be that intelligent after all, right?

I can go further and say that the existence of Michael Jackson proves that humans evolved from apes, but that is another topic for another blog entry.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

i

really don't think its necessary to teach theory of evolution or theory of ID, ppl end up worshiping money anyway, darwin nor jesus can win against george washington

ahem,

a bit of typo error there, i meant to say neither science or religion can compete against money

joyfulchicken's picture

I actually liked

the "neither Darwin nor Jesus can win against George Washington" line. Good one, hehehe.

You may get into trouble with your boss philos for this though. I've heard that he is a big Jesus fan.

and

forgot to mention its an awesome blog, most of the entries in here is awesome !! genius !!

joyfulchicken's picture

Thanks

Nice to know that some people mistake our mental disorders for genius.

I still can't believe that philos has underlings. I want underlings too. Hmm.

funny

thing, by the time i became a midling in high school, philos become my overling, so that kinda puts me back on undeling hood...

ArsenaL's picture

Stop picking on Michael

Stop picking on Michael Jackson. Hehe

joyfulchicken's picture

I'm not picking on him

I'm just presenting him as evidence supporting evolution.

You do believe in evolution, don't you?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <p> <br> <a> <img> <embed> <object> <param> <big> <small> <b> <i> <u> <s> <sub> <sup> <hr> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <h7> <pre> <tt> <em> <strong> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <table> <th> <tr> <td>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
Prove that you're not a spamming bot, anonymous chicken.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.